Well, it seems as if ‘Tommy Robinson’ is out of prison, albeit on bail – despite how some are interpreting his ‘release’. He did not seem to say much on his way out of confinement, but posted a video of his seeing his children for the first time in a while at home – if anything I might question why he felt it necessary to post that on social media?
Then we have reports of the Judge laughing by a window – frankly I doubt that. If he was laughing – and Judges do laugh – I would be surprised that he would laugh at the release, or anything to do with it – and also be caught on camera.
I must admit that I am bemused and unclear as to what precisely – in simple and uncomplicated terms – Tommy Robinson stands for.
The BBC, of course, continue to label him “extreme right” and refer to his past (now divorced) associations in their own inimitable way. But it seems very difficult to understand, amongst all the/his outputs on social media, what exactly he is getting at. He seems to be saying, for example, that he has no problems with Muslims per se, but is concerned about Islam and especially its seemingly unambiguous connection with child abuse in many towns across the UK, as well as its connection with many ‘social ills’ such as FGM.
He also seems concerned about the lack/merits of Islamic ‘cohesion’ and ‘diversity’ and the inevitable ‘ghettos’ that are growing all the time across the UK. All this on a day when Sharia law seems to have been recognised in UK courts in a divorce case.
Reflecting on the issues mentioned above (and I guess there are many more) I find myself asking ‘so what is the problem’ with having views like this? I also wonder why he doesn’t manage to find some time to clarify really this/his position, so that those that support him from an extremist point of view desert him, those that criticise him for his ‘extreme right wing’ views back off and those that recognise his concerns (perhaps even the majority more generally) become more ‘mainstream’.
Listening to and watching the BBC, it seems that the vast amount of their output of general programmes and news and news-related programmes, feature, advocate and disproportionately support minorities.
A big question for me is, if you added up most these minorities would that be or represent a/the majority? If the answer is yes, then thats fine – but if, as I believe the answer is no, then there is (and UK society has) a problem. The problem being that there is no ‘representation’ of ‘normal’, ‘middle of the road’ people and their values, beliefs or opinions – and that is just on the BBC, never mind politically or more widely.
I recall that when I worked in the field of management and leadership development, there was little or no media available on good and effective management or leadership. This was largely because that was not entertaining and even seen as boring. It’s the same with most ‘commercial output’ on ‘analogue’ or ‘digital’ media – and certainly the BBC. Where are the ‘normal’ characters and/or plots on The Archers, Eastenders or Emmerdale? There used to be a lot on Coronation Street but even that has changed.
Whatever the reason, the BBC are obsessed with representing what they see as reality, in and around Portland Place. regarding our obligatory and apparently inevitable ‘diverse’ society. Listening to the Today programme on Radio 4 this morning, they had am ‘un-checked’ view from a representative of one of these minority groups “The way England is going to look in the future”… If that is not social engineering or brainwashing I don’t know what is. Then there was a feature supposedly about ‘classical music’ and even that was a thinly disguised focus on ethnic minorities.
There is, by the way, nothing inherently wrong with a ‘diverse society’, but not on this scale or so fast.
It is not necessary to name these key minorities, as anyone reading this will know and understand what and who they are. Amongst other things, the big issue seems to be, why are the publicly-funded BBC (and others) focussing on these groups – what is their motivation or objective in supporting, encouraging or possibly accelerating such social engineering and change?