Gender…

Each and every week there are more and more stories in the news and on social media, of people doing ever more stupid things around gender and the ‘feminazis’…and others whom appeared, until now, to be quite well balanced human beings.

Today is a classic example.

  1. Apparently Keira Knightley bans her 3-year old daughter from watching some Disney (yes Disney!) films because of the ‘girly’ characters and role models. This from someone who has made millions from playing ‘girly girls’!
  2. I saw photos of a wedding between 2 men and one (with a beard) was dressed in a white wedding dress, veil and long ‘train’.
  3. Kleenex have been attacked for making “Kleenex for men” and have decided in their wisdom to withdraw them from the market.
  4. An ‘ex-male’ wins a female bike race – wow there’s a surprise!
  5. 6-year old children being taught (in state schools) how to write love letters – to members of the same sex!

These are just 5 of many many examples in this increasing perverse and, frankly, lunatic world in the last few days alone.

This all seems to me to be yet another farcical area of our lives that is being driven by female (and other types of) ‘social terrorists’, who are set on changing the established norms in the UK and elsewhere in the ‘western world’, at a rate that has never been seen since the beginning of the human race – or possibly earlier as some aspects of all this were in place before then.

It would seem that the majority of the population (both male and female) are standing idly by with their ‘mouths wide open’ and seemingly powerless at such social engineering, that is happening everywhere and ‘in broad daylight’.

Social engineering – “Rage, rage against the dying of the light”

In recent weeks I have come to the conclusion that we in the UK are being actively socially engineered. I don’t believe that this is a recent phenomenon and do believe that this brainwashing began to accelerate, probably in the late 60s, when we began to be brainwashed right across the spectrum. Whether culturally, in accepting, for example, that the vast majority of so-called pop music had any artistic merit – which by any musical analysis is doesn’t – or in terms of more profound issues that have changed more quickly than at any time in history driven by (our) ‘wants’…and not (our) needs. This list might also include contraception, our acquisitive tendencies, abortion, divorce, the law, education, (demise of) religion and other traditions that have upheld us for many centuries.

Worse still and whilst we are so self-absorbed and ‘navel-gazing’ on the issue of Brexit, if you take a step back, it is obvious that the media – and especially the BBC – have stepped into this void and, with their left-leaning stance on many traditional issues and more importably values carefully curated over centuries, have contributed to even more acceleration, largely through the ‘back door’ and often fairly subliminally. Add this to the initiatives from Jeremy Corbyn and his Marxist followers and you have all the ingredients for a massive cultural and social shift that will change things for the worse and for ever – or until there is a sizeable cataclysm of some order or other.

Despite some thought, I cannot see that this is being driven by one person or organisation and therefore conclude that it is one of those unfortunate coincidences that occur throughout history and with the added catalyst of, for example, social media, we now have a pace and scale not seen before. If one looks across various platforms and at the views of ‘normal’ and ‘sensible’ liberal people from both the ‘left’ and ‘right’ it seems clear that there is a void emerging that would, in one form or other, recognise (that) this (is) social engineering. Much like Brexit, it is understood but there is no clarity and possibly fear of the issues or the consequences and so, what I believe to be a ‘majority’, are ‘frozen in the headlights’. With no traditional ‘safety-nets’ such as religion or trust in the law and Parliament to fall back on, we are indeed ‘frozen’.

To extract from words of Dylan Thomas:

Do not go gentle into that good night…Rage, rage against the dying of the light…

Tommy…

Well, it seems as if ‘Tommy Robinson’ is out of prison, albeit on bail – despite how some are interpreting his ‘release’. He did not seem to say much on his way out of confinement, but posted a video of his seeing his children for the first time in a while at home – if anything I might question why he felt it necessary to post that on social media?

Then we have reports of the Judge laughing by a window – frankly I doubt that. If he was laughing – and Judges do laugh – I would be surprised that he would laugh at the release, or anything to do with it – and also be caught on camera.

I must admit that I am bemused and unclear as to what precisely – in simple and uncomplicated terms – Tommy Robinson stands for.

The BBC, of course, continue to label him “extreme right” and refer to his past (now divorced) associations in their own inimitable way. But it seems very difficult to understand, amongst all the/his outputs on social media, what exactly he is getting at. He seems to be saying, for example, that he has no problems with Muslims per se, but is concerned about Islam and especially its seemingly unambiguous connection with child abuse in many towns across the UK, as well as its connection with many ‘social ills’ such as FGM.

He also seems concerned about the lack/merits of Islamic ‘cohesion’ and ‘diversity’ and the inevitable ‘ghettos’ that are growing all the time across the UK. All this on a day when Sharia law seems to have been recognised in UK courts in a divorce case.

Reflecting on the issues mentioned above (and I guess there are many more) I find myself asking ‘so what is the problem’ with having views like this? I also wonder why he doesn’t manage to find some time to clarify really this/his position, so that those that support him from an extremist point of view desert him, those that criticise him for his ‘extreme right wing’ views back off and those that recognise his concerns (perhaps even the majority more generally) become more ‘mainstream’.

 

The state of British politics

This morning I listened to BBC Radio 4 Today to ‘catch up’ with what is going on in the world and especially in the UK. Anyone listening could not fail (as usual) to be worried by what they heard.

It seems to me that we are in a bad way on so many levels. Whether from a Party-political point of view, where the main parties are in various forms of chaos driven from within by scandals such as antisemitism in the Labour Party, or leadership problems elsewhere or because it seems increasingly unclear what the main Parties stand for, or clarity as to how they have really changed in recent years. I am confused and I am sure many others are as well.

Many Parties are now attempting to ‘buy’ support by offering short-term ‘bribes’, many of which do little for the long term or ‘broad well-being’ of the UK. There now seem to be so many minority groups and people pandering to them, that any clear view of the majority (and their common values) is becoming ever more difficult to see or understand. Then there is Brexit and what has, is or will happened since the referendum 2 years ago. It seems to infect (and arguably should impinge on) every aspect of our lives. The trouble is that many people (predominantly younger people) seem indifferent to/ill-informed about Brexit or, more worryingly, about politics more generally. Clearly, there are some younger people who are very engaged in politics, or what they see as ‘politics’, however they seem to be predominantly on the left of the spectrum and very gullible to/very short-sighted on the ‘bribes’ offered by Jeremy Corbin and his acolytes.

So why is no-one standing up and offering new alternatives or sorting many of these issues out within the Parties themselves? Why are the ‘majority’ (from ‘left’ and ‘right’) not ‘standing up’ and ‘being counted’?

With a General Election still a few years away, the opportunities for people to ‘go round in circles’ and basing their actions on the outputs or even fake news from various forms of media (that are primarily also doing lots of ‘naval gazing’ in an attempt to reconcile their position and responsibilities in the age and rise of social media) are undoubtedly rife in and potentially destructive of all established sections of the political spectrum.

Minorities and the BBC

Listening to and watching the BBC, it seems that the vast amount of their output of general programmes and news and news-related programmes, feature, advocate and disproportionately support minorities.

A big question for me is, if you added up most these minorities would that be or represent a/the majority? If the answer is yes, then thats fine – but if, as I believe the answer is no, then there is (and UK society has) a problem. The problem being that there is no ‘representation’ of ‘normal’, ‘middle of the road’ people and their values, beliefs or opinions – and that is just on the BBC, never mind politically or more widely.

I recall that when I worked in the field of management and leadership development, there was little or no media available on good and effective management or leadership. This was largely because that was not entertaining and even seen as boring. It’s the same with most ‘commercial output’ on ‘analogue’ or ‘digital’ media – and certainly the BBC. Where are the ‘normal’ characters and/or plots on The Archers, Eastenders or Emmerdale? There used to be a lot on Coronation Street but even that has changed.

Whatever the reason, the BBC are obsessed with representing what they see as reality, in and around Portland Place. regarding our obligatory and apparently inevitable ‘diverse’ society. Listening to the Today programme on Radio 4 this morning, they had am ‘un-checked’ view from a representative of one of these minority groups “The way England is going to look in the future”… If that is not social engineering or brainwashing I don’t know what is. Then there was a feature supposedly about ‘classical music’ and even that was a thinly disguised focus on ethnic minorities.

There is, by the way, nothing inherently wrong with a ‘diverse society’, but not on this scale or so fast.

It is not necessary to name these key minorities, as anyone reading this will know and understand what and who they are. Amongst other things, the big issue seems to be, why are the publicly-funded BBC (and others) focussing on these groups – what is their motivation or objective in supporting, encouraging or possibly accelerating such social engineering and change?

Meghansyndrome

This time last week I sat down, with many millions of others, to watch the Royal Wedding of Prince Harry to Meghan Markle. It was a lovely event (despite the BBC being obsessed with her black heritage – actually only half black) and disproportionately focussing on issues related to that. Yes, the ‘sermon’ went on too long, but the preacher clearly felt passionately about his subject and that was, at least in-principle, a reasonable text to focus on, given the occasion. Otherwise, it was a very happy event.

Since then and seemingly increasingly, the wider media are also obsessing about her ‘heritage’ and every aspect of her past and present. There is even an US outlet asking (in all seriousness) what sort of Queen she will make. Others are saying that she is putting the Duchess of Cambridge ‘into the shadows’.

Initially, when Princess Diana married Prince Charles many years ago, things went well and, of course, we were in a very different world with regards to media and especially social media. Towards the end of her life, things really hotted up and the ‘paparazzi’ had a major role in her demise.

The effect that Diana had on our consciousness as a nation and more widely, has been dramatic, not so much in terms of the direct effects, but more in terms of societally. Our ’emotional incontinence’ has magnified and continues to accelerate so that in a relatively short period of time and right across a nation that was historically and traditionally recognised (globally) for its ‘stiff upper lip’. These changes continue unchallenged.

So the Dianasyndrome is alive and well whether, for example, on TV, at the Grenfell Tower enquiry or by the roadside, where people leave plastic flowers apparently in memory of loved ones. But we now have, additionally, Meghansyndrome, which is taking off nicely and, if it coincides with or overtakes Dianasyndrome, has the potential to be even more destructive for the UK as a nation (and possibly the Monarchy) on a number of levels.